New Laws in Wisconsin 2021

Uncategorized No Comments

As of January 2021, Governor Evers had signed 267 bills and vetoed 126, breaking the previous record of 90 vetoes set by Governor Fred Zimmerman (R) in 1928, according to the Legislative Reference Bureau (LRB). After reporting on his actions in March, Governor Evers issued two legislative decisions in April. Senate Democrats voted against the measure in February, in part because of a provision requested by business lobby Wisconsin Manufacturers & Commerce that would prevent local governments from setting up charging stations for the public and charging fees. The assembly amended the bill to allow an exemption for stations built under the Federal Infrastructure Act of 2021 with subsidies from the state Department of Transportation, and if no tax money is used to build the station and royalty revenues are not used to supplement the local government budget. On April 15, Governor Evers announced his decisions on the remaining 43 bills that were passed by both houses of the Legislative Assembly during the 2021-2022 session. The governor signed 15 bills as Bills 253 to 267 and vetoed 28. However, a handful of laws only came into effect in early 2022. We are particularly concerned about the amount you pay at the pharmacy. In addition to the regular session of the Senate, Evers convened a special session, starting Tuesday, to debate and vote on legislation put in place to allocate a portion of the state`s projected $5.5 billion surplus for the 2021-2023 fiscal period, including $750 million for public schools. $150 in tax relief for each Wisconsin resident. An expanded tax credit for children and a new tax credit for caregivers. On April 8, Governor Evers announced that he had taken action against 78 bills, signed 35 bills and vetoed 43 others.

Wisconsin`s 2021 Bill 252 was perhaps the most notable, which authorizes the borrowing of nearly $42 million to build a new juvenile detention center in Milwaukee County. This facility will replace the troubled Lincoln Hills and Copper Lake schools in Irma. Existing facilities have been controversial due to violent incidents and ongoing reports from staff of safety concerns. The bill originated in the Senate as Senate Bill (SB) 520. MADISON, Wis. — Madison lawmakers passed several bills in 2021, and most of those bills went into effect immediately after Gov. Tony Evers signed them. However, none of the governor`s outstanding ministerial appointments are on the list. The 2021 Evers Natural Resources Council will also not be nominated for a seat still held by Frederick Prehn, a commissioner to former Governor Scott Walker, whose term expired but has refused to leave until a successor is confirmed. LeMahieu told WisPolitics.com in January that he did not expect to plan further confirmations for the Evers commissioners before the election. Among the new laws, numbered as Bills 218 to 252, Governor Evers also signed two bills relating to the unemployment insurance (Bill 231) and workers` compensation (Bill 232) programs, as agreed to by the respective advisory councils, including representatives of employer and worker associations.

Among the bills vetoed on April 8 were a number of measures introduced by Republican lawmakers to recruit, retain and train law enforcement and correctional officers, and to reimburse local governments for certain costs related to policing. In Illinois, depending on when a law is passed, laws typically go into effect in June or January. The new laws stem from the shooting of Jacob Blake by police in Kenosha, after which the Racial Disparities Task Force was formed to propose new laws. For Michigan, most new laws don`t take effect until at least 90 days after the end of the legislature. However, there are exceptions for laws that exceed a certain threshold. Republicans who pushed the proposed change argued that the legislature rightly plays a role in the decision to spend federal money on the state, such as the pandemic relief funds Wisconsin received in 2020 and 2021. Democrats have argued that the proposal would make the distribution of these funds heavier at a time when swift action is needed. State laws in the 1930s left this control to the governor`s office. Many pharmacists across the state have also complained about PBM practices, saying they are often prevented from educating their customers about other, cheaper generic options. According to the Senate`s decision on Tuesday, the resolution must be resubmitted to each chamber during the 2023-2024 legislature and then to the voting public in the form of a voting question. Senator Dale Kooyenga (R-Brookfield), the sponsor of the proposal, said he hoped the referendum would be held in 2024. Another proposal that passed the convention without Democratic votes (AB-912) would limit the governor`s power to be selective when shutting down businesses in the event of a national emergency.

Specifically, Governor Evers signed Law 254 (originally SB 392), which authorizes the authorized practice of extended function dental assistants (EFDAs). Licensed EFDAs will be able to perform certain tasks related to dentistry and dental hygiene, such as assisting with restorations, taking impressions, and applying sealants and fluorides. Prior to its passage, the Assembly amended the bill to remove “supragingival scaling” from the list of procedures EFDAs are allowed to perform, addressing a concern raised by dental hygienists. Proponents of the policy say it will reduce the cost of dental care and promote access to dental care in underserved areas. Earlier this year, a law regulating the use of force by police officers came into force. “If someone came to the pharmacy to pick up a prescription and their co-payment for the medication that their prescribing doctor had offered them was very high, we couldn`t tell them that there was a cheaper alternative, or that there was a cheaper way to buy that drug, or that there were other options for them.” Schumacher said. While the Senate seems poised to ignore both Evers` proposal to increase school funding and business demand from business leaders, the panel will take up a number of burning school-related issues that the governor will almost certainly veto. Legislation passed last year to regulate PBMs has enjoyed broad bipartisan support. At the time, lawmakers tried to keep prescription drug prices and consumer premiums low. Schumacher hopes to make this a reality with the law currently in force. The apparent rejection of Evers` proposal follows a call by a broad coalition of business-focused groups and others who last week put forward a proposal to support public schools, similar to, but separate from, the governor`s.

“The Senate will not accept the governor`s special session,” Adam Gibbs, director of communications for Senate Majority Leader Devin LeMahieu (R-Oostburg), said in an email Monday. “Knowledge is power, and if we can give the consumer more options, the full range of options available to them and the whole range of prices available, then I think the consumer will win,” Schumacher said. The newly enacted law repeals so-called “muzzle orders” and requires PBMs to be authorized by the state if they have not already been authorized. Deputy editor Erik Gunn reports and writes on labor and economics, health policy, and related topics for the Wisconsin Examiner. He spent 24 years as a freelance writer for Milwaukee Magazine, Isthmus, The Progressive, BNA Inc. and other publications, winning awards for investigative journalism, reporting sections, rhythm reporting, business writing and commentary. The East Coast-born employee previously worked for the Milwaukee Journal after working for newspapers in upstate New York and northern Illinois. He is a graduate of Beloit College (English Comp.) and the Columbia School of Journalism.

Outside of office hours, he is the fanboy of Springsteen and Jackson Browne and the nerd of the Examiner`s model railroad. With respect to Wisconsin, some bills do not take effect immediately because they set a specific date, such as 1. January, usually to have time to comply with a new law. Law enforcement officers now have a legal duty to intervene when a colleague uses excessive force.